Jump to content

The Cost-Benefit Analysis of Unit, Integration, and E2E Testing


Recommended Posts

In software testing, the goal is to balance thoroughness with manageability. Unit testing is efficient and manageable, yet it plateaus in effectiveness beyond 70% coverage, a benchmark difficult to achieve in practice. End-to-end (E2E) testing, while comprehensive, becomes increasingly challenging to maintain as software complexity grows, making full coverage impossible. Integration testing is indispensable for ensuring components work together seamlessly, but it also demands more maintenance with software expansion. The key is to strategically combine these testing methods to ensure software quality without overburdening the process, recognizing that more testing doesn't always translate to better outcomes.

“Teams always want to reach high E2E coverage but can’t — and they should reach high unit testing coverage but don’t.“

16567106.gif

View the full article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...